diff options
| author | erdgeist <erdgeist@erdgeist.org> | 2026-06-27 22:52:50 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | erdgeist <erdgeist@erdgeist.org> | 2026-06-27 22:52:50 +0200 |
| commit | 9a19a0494ef51cdac9a78e24d517ca48ba44c453 (patch) | |
| tree | 8eaae12d8047a40e29d3ea7ff3116b5c869e04bd /public/leap-seconds.list | |
| parent | 85a01e35274b8d4d4165a7b26bd7986e211246bb (diff) | |
| parent | 1853082fcd8c067390c246f9daa01a9b47387497 (diff) | |
Migration from Rails 2.3.5 to Rails 8.1 successful.
Merging dev branch.
Diffstat (limited to 'public/leap-seconds.list')
| -rw-r--r-- | public/leap-seconds.list | 255 |
1 files changed, 255 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/public/leap-seconds.list b/public/leap-seconds.list new file mode 100644 index 0000000..eab6ab8 --- /dev/null +++ b/public/leap-seconds.list | |||
| @@ -0,0 +1,255 @@ | |||
| 1 | # | ||
| 2 | # In the following text, the symbol '#' introduces | ||
| 3 | # a comment, which continues from that symbol until | ||
| 4 | # the end of the line. A plain comment line has a | ||
| 5 | # whitespace character following the comment indicator. | ||
| 6 | # There are also special comment lines defined below. | ||
| 7 | # A special comment will always have a non-whitespace | ||
| 8 | # character in column 2. | ||
| 9 | # | ||
| 10 | # A blank line should be ignored. | ||
| 11 | # | ||
| 12 | # The following table shows the corrections that must | ||
| 13 | # be applied to compute International Atomic Time (TAI) | ||
| 14 | # from the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) values that | ||
| 15 | # are transmitted by almost all time services. | ||
| 16 | # | ||
| 17 | # The first column shows an epoch as a number of seconds | ||
| 18 | # since 1 January 1900, 00:00:00 (1900.0 is also used to | ||
| 19 | # indicate the same epoch.) Both of these time stamp formats | ||
| 20 | # ignore the complexities of the time scales that were | ||
| 21 | # used before the current definition of UTC at the start | ||
| 22 | # of 1972. (See note 3 below.) | ||
| 23 | # The second column shows the number of seconds that | ||
| 24 | # must be added to UTC to compute TAI for any timestamp | ||
| 25 | # at or after that epoch. The value on each line is | ||
| 26 | # valid from the indicated initial instant until the | ||
| 27 | # epoch given on the next one or indefinitely into the | ||
| 28 | # future if there is no next line. | ||
| 29 | # (The comment on each line shows the representation of | ||
| 30 | # the corresponding initial epoch in the usual | ||
| 31 | # day-month-year format. The epoch always begins at | ||
| 32 | # 00:00:00 UTC on the indicated day. See Note 5 below.) | ||
| 33 | # | ||
| 34 | # Important notes: | ||
| 35 | # | ||
| 36 | # 1. Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) is often referred to | ||
| 37 | # as Greenwich Mean Time (GMT). The GMT time scale is no | ||
| 38 | # longer used, and the use of GMT to designate UTC is | ||
| 39 | # discouraged. | ||
| 40 | # | ||
| 41 | # 2. The UTC time scale is realized by many national | ||
| 42 | # laboratories and timing centers. Each laboratory | ||
| 43 | # identifies its realization with its name: Thus | ||
| 44 | # UTC(NIST), UTC(USNO), etc. The differences among | ||
| 45 | # these different realizations are typically on the | ||
| 46 | # order of a few nanoseconds (i.e., 0.000 000 00x s) | ||
| 47 | # and can be ignored for many purposes. These differences | ||
| 48 | # are tabulated in Circular T, which is published monthly | ||
| 49 | # by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures | ||
| 50 | # (BIPM). See www.bipm.org for more information. | ||
| 51 | # | ||
| 52 | # 3. The current definition of the relationship between UTC | ||
| 53 | # and TAI dates from 1 January 1972. A number of different | ||
| 54 | # time scales were in use before that epoch, and it can be | ||
| 55 | # quite difficult to compute precise timestamps and time | ||
| 56 | # intervals in those "prehistoric" days. For more information, | ||
| 57 | # consult: | ||
| 58 | # | ||
| 59 | # The Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical | ||
| 60 | # Ephemeris. | ||
| 61 | # or | ||
| 62 | # Terry Quinn, "The BIPM and the Accurate Measurement | ||
| 63 | # of Time," Proc. of the IEEE, Vol. 79, pp. 894-905, | ||
| 64 | # July, 1991. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/5.84965> | ||
| 65 | # reprinted in: | ||
| 66 | # Christine Hackman and Donald B Sullivan (eds.) | ||
| 67 | # Time and Frequency Measurement | ||
| 68 | # American Association of Physics Teachers (1996) | ||
| 69 | # <http://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/1168.pdf>, pp. 75-86 | ||
| 70 | # | ||
| 71 | # 4. The decision to insert a leap second into UTC is currently | ||
| 72 | # the responsibility of the International Earth Rotation and | ||
| 73 | # Reference Systems Service. (The name was changed from the | ||
| 74 | # International Earth Rotation Service, but the acronym IERS | ||
| 75 | # is still used.) | ||
| 76 | # | ||
| 77 | # Leap seconds are announced by the IERS in its Bulletin C. | ||
| 78 | # | ||
| 79 | # See www.iers.org for more details. | ||
| 80 | # | ||
| 81 | # Every national laboratory and timing center uses the | ||
| 82 | # data from the BIPM and the IERS to construct UTC(lab), | ||
| 83 | # their local realization of UTC. | ||
| 84 | # | ||
| 85 | # Although the definition also includes the possibility | ||
| 86 | # of dropping seconds ("negative" leap seconds), this has | ||
| 87 | # never been done and is unlikely to be necessary in the | ||
| 88 | # foreseeable future. | ||
| 89 | # | ||
| 90 | # 5. If your system keeps time as the number of seconds since | ||
| 91 | # some epoch (e.g., NTP timestamps), then the algorithm for | ||
| 92 | # assigning a UTC time stamp to an event that happens during a positive | ||
| 93 | # leap second is not well defined. The official name of that leap | ||
| 94 | # second is 23:59:60, but there is no way of representing that time | ||
| 95 | # in these systems. | ||
| 96 | # Many systems of this type effectively stop the system clock for | ||
| 97 | # one second during the leap second and use a time that is equivalent | ||
| 98 | # to 23:59:59 UTC twice. For these systems, the corresponding TAI | ||
| 99 | # timestamp would be obtained by advancing to the next entry in the | ||
| 100 | # following table when the time equivalent to 23:59:59 UTC | ||
| 101 | # is used for the second time. Thus the leap second which | ||
| 102 | # occurred on 30 June 1972 at 23:59:59 UTC would have TAI | ||
| 103 | # timestamps computed as follows: | ||
| 104 | # | ||
| 105 | # ... | ||
| 106 | # 30 June 1972 23:59:59 (2287785599, first time): TAI= UTC + 10 seconds | ||
| 107 | # 30 June 1972 23:59:60 (2287785599,second time): TAI= UTC + 11 seconds | ||
| 108 | # 1 July 1972 00:00:00 (2287785600) TAI= UTC + 11 seconds | ||
| 109 | # ... | ||
| 110 | # | ||
| 111 | # If your system realizes the leap second by repeating 00:00:00 UTC twice | ||
| 112 | # (this is possible but not usual), then the advance to the next entry | ||
| 113 | # in the table must occur the second time that a time equivalent to | ||
| 114 | # 00:00:00 UTC is used. Thus, using the same example as above: | ||
| 115 | # | ||
| 116 | # ... | ||
| 117 | # 30 June 1972 23:59:59 (2287785599): TAI= UTC + 10 seconds | ||
| 118 | # 30 June 1972 23:59:60 (2287785600, first time): TAI= UTC + 10 seconds | ||
| 119 | # 1 July 1972 00:00:00 (2287785600,second time): TAI= UTC + 11 seconds | ||
| 120 | # ... | ||
| 121 | # | ||
| 122 | # in both cases the use of timestamps based on TAI produces a smooth | ||
| 123 | # time scale with no discontinuity in the time interval. However, | ||
| 124 | # although the long-term behavior of the time scale is correct in both | ||
| 125 | # methods, the second method is technically not correct because it adds | ||
| 126 | # the extra second to the wrong day. | ||
| 127 | # | ||
| 128 | # This complexity would not be needed for negative leap seconds (if they | ||
| 129 | # are ever used). The UTC time would skip 23:59:59 and advance from | ||
| 130 | # 23:59:58 to 00:00:00 in that case. The TAI offset would decrease by | ||
| 131 | # 1 second at the same instant. This is a much easier situation to deal | ||
| 132 | # with, since the difficulty of unambiguously representing the epoch | ||
| 133 | # during the leap second does not arise. | ||
| 134 | # | ||
| 135 | # Some systems implement leap seconds by amortizing the leap second | ||
| 136 | # over the last few minutes of the day. The frequency of the local | ||
| 137 | # clock is decreased (or increased) to realize the positive (or | ||
| 138 | # negative) leap second. This method removes the time step described | ||
| 139 | # above. Although the long-term behavior of the time scale is correct | ||
| 140 | # in this case, this method introduces an error during the adjustment | ||
| 141 | # period both in time and in frequency with respect to the official | ||
| 142 | # definition of UTC. | ||
| 143 | # | ||
| 144 | # Questions or comments to: | ||
| 145 | # Judah Levine | ||
| 146 | # Time and Frequency Division | ||
| 147 | # NIST | ||
| 148 | # Boulder, Colorado | ||
| 149 | # Judah.Levine@nist.gov | ||
| 150 | # | ||
| 151 | # Last Update of leap second values: 8 July 2016 | ||
| 152 | # | ||
| 153 | # The following line shows this last update date in NTP timestamp | ||
| 154 | # format. This is the date on which the most recent change to | ||
| 155 | # the leap second data was added to the file. This line can | ||
| 156 | # be identified by the unique pair of characters in the first two | ||
| 157 | # columns as shown below. | ||
| 158 | # | ||
| 159 | #$ 3676924800 | ||
| 160 | # | ||
| 161 | # The NTP timestamps are in units of seconds since the NTP epoch, | ||
| 162 | # which is 1 January 1900, 00:00:00. The Modified Julian Day number | ||
| 163 | # corresponding to the NTP time stamp, X, can be computed as | ||
| 164 | # | ||
| 165 | # X/86400 + 15020 | ||
| 166 | # | ||
| 167 | # where the first term converts seconds to days and the second | ||
| 168 | # term adds the MJD corresponding to the time origin defined above. | ||
| 169 | # The integer portion of the result is the integer MJD for that | ||
| 170 | # day, and any remainder is the time of day, expressed as the | ||
| 171 | # fraction of the day since 0 hours UTC. The conversion from day | ||
| 172 | # fraction to seconds or to hours, minutes, and seconds may involve | ||
| 173 | # rounding or truncation, depending on the method used in the | ||
| 174 | # computation. | ||
| 175 | # | ||
| 176 | # The data in this file will be updated periodically as new leap | ||
| 177 | # seconds are announced. In addition to being entered on the line | ||
| 178 | # above, the update time (in NTP format) will be added to the basic | ||
| 179 | # file name leap-seconds to form the name leap-seconds.<NTP TIME>. | ||
| 180 | # In addition, the generic name leap-seconds.list will always point to | ||
| 181 | # the most recent version of the file. | ||
| 182 | # | ||
| 183 | # This update procedure will be performed only when a new leap second | ||
| 184 | # is announced. | ||
| 185 | # | ||
| 186 | # The following entry specifies the expiration date of the data | ||
| 187 | # in this file in units of seconds since the origin at the instant | ||
| 188 | # 1 January 1900, 00:00:00. This expiration date will be changed | ||
| 189 | # at least twice per year whether or not a new leap second is | ||
| 190 | # announced. These semi-annual changes will be made no later | ||
| 191 | # than 1 June and 1 December of each year to indicate what | ||
| 192 | # action (if any) is to be taken on 30 June and 31 December, | ||
| 193 | # respectively. (These are the customary effective dates for new | ||
| 194 | # leap seconds.) This expiration date will be identified by a | ||
| 195 | # unique pair of characters in columns 1 and 2 as shown below. | ||
| 196 | # In the unlikely event that a leap second is announced with an | ||
| 197 | # effective date other than 30 June or 31 December, then this | ||
| 198 | # file will be edited to include that leap second as soon as it is | ||
| 199 | # announced or at least one month before the effective date | ||
| 200 | # (whichever is later). | ||
| 201 | # If an announcement by the IERS specifies that no leap second is | ||
| 202 | # scheduled, then only the expiration date of the file will | ||
| 203 | # be advanced to show that the information in the file is still | ||
| 204 | # current -- the update time stamp, the data and the name of the file | ||
| 205 | # will not change. | ||
| 206 | # | ||
| 207 | # Updated through IERS Bulletin C55 | ||
| 208 | # File expires on: 28 December 2018 | ||
| 209 | # | ||
| 210 | #@ 3754944000 | ||
| 211 | # | ||
| 212 | 2272060800 10 # 1 Jan 1972 | ||
| 213 | 2287785600 11 # 1 Jul 1972 | ||
| 214 | 2303683200 12 # 1 Jan 1973 | ||
| 215 | 2335219200 13 # 1 Jan 1974 | ||
| 216 | 2366755200 14 # 1 Jan 1975 | ||
| 217 | 2398291200 15 # 1 Jan 1976 | ||
| 218 | 2429913600 16 # 1 Jan 1977 | ||
| 219 | 2461449600 17 # 1 Jan 1978 | ||
| 220 | 2492985600 18 # 1 Jan 1979 | ||
| 221 | 2524521600 19 # 1 Jan 1980 | ||
| 222 | 2571782400 20 # 1 Jul 1981 | ||
| 223 | 2603318400 21 # 1 Jul 1982 | ||
| 224 | 2634854400 22 # 1 Jul 1983 | ||
| 225 | 2698012800 23 # 1 Jul 1985 | ||
| 226 | 2776982400 24 # 1 Jan 1988 | ||
| 227 | 2840140800 25 # 1 Jan 1990 | ||
| 228 | 2871676800 26 # 1 Jan 1991 | ||
| 229 | 2918937600 27 # 1 Jul 1992 | ||
| 230 | 2950473600 28 # 1 Jul 1993 | ||
| 231 | 2982009600 29 # 1 Jul 1994 | ||
| 232 | 3029443200 30 # 1 Jan 1996 | ||
| 233 | 3076704000 31 # 1 Jul 1997 | ||
| 234 | 3124137600 32 # 1 Jan 1999 | ||
| 235 | 3345062400 33 # 1 Jan 2006 | ||
| 236 | 3439756800 34 # 1 Jan 2009 | ||
| 237 | 3550089600 35 # 1 Jul 2012 | ||
| 238 | 3644697600 36 # 1 Jul 2015 | ||
| 239 | 3692217600 37 # 1 Jan 2017 | ||
| 240 | # | ||
| 241 | # the following special comment contains the | ||
| 242 | # hash value of the data in this file computed | ||
| 243 | # use the secure hash algorithm as specified | ||
| 244 | # by FIPS 180-1. See the files in ~/pub/sha for | ||
| 245 | # the details of how this hash value is | ||
| 246 | # computed. Note that the hash computation | ||
| 247 | # ignores comments and whitespace characters | ||
| 248 | # in data lines. It includes the NTP values | ||
| 249 | # of both the last modification time and the | ||
| 250 | # expiration time of the file, but not the | ||
| 251 | # white space on those lines. | ||
| 252 | # the hash line is also ignored in the | ||
| 253 | # computation. | ||
| 254 | # | ||
| 255 | #h 44dcf58c e28d25aa b36612c8 f3d3e8b5 a8fdf478 | ||
